Thursday, July 12, 2012
John Frank repeated his request of DDA to City Council 7.10.12: initiate a committee to meet with Kadushin Associates
I’m
John Frank; I live at 138 East Middle Street.
I
am requesting that you please appoint a committee to meet with the
developer, Kadushin Associates, who submitted a proposal to
rehabilitate the Longworth properties. I made this request to the DDA
at their last meeting and I was ignored.
The
purpose of this proposed committee would be to resolve several
misunderstandings that were created by a resolution the DDA passed on
June
7th.
When
they presented their proposal to the DDA at a special meeting on May
31st, Kadushin
Associates made clear how they expected to finance the project, and
the required timeline. At the following meeting on June 7th
the DDA passed a resolution that Kadushin perceived as having erected
two insurmountable barriers. Some members of the DDA now say that the
resolution did not say what they meant, and that led to a
misunderstanding.
Upon
receipt of the resolution Abe Kadushin asked our City Manager to meet
with him to clarify these issues. Abe told me that he was stunned
that the City Manager refused to meet with him. This was “the straw
that broke the camel’s back.” ----- Abe then took the advice of
his attorney and withdrew their offer, and told me that trying to
work with Chelsea was, quote, “too much hassle” – “too much
hassle”.
I
believe Chelsea will suffer if we are silent about what we know from
experience is wrong. And what is my experience? Although I do not own
a business in Chelsea, I did devote eleven years, prior to my
retirement, as a Senior Partner in a 250-person consultancy that
worked with large organizations, helping them to improve their
business processes. I do know something about business.
My
experience in business taught me that criterion number one in doing
business is:
Love
Your Customer. A developer is – or should be thought of as – an
esteemed potential customer. This customer wants to spend 3.7 million
dollars in our community to create new tax-paying business. We ought
to reach out to him. Make it easy for him to do business with us.
Instead of saying, as one us did, “I for one am not ready to move
forward by inviting them back,” we should have said “I will meet
with you at your convenience to resolve misunderstandings and I will
work with you to find a mutually beneficial way for us to move
forward together.”
Since
the name on the deed for the Longworth property has the City as the
owner, it is time that the City Council exercise leadership on this
matter, in accordance with the ethical principles for the government
of the City of Chelsea. A
non-voting sub-committee could be appointed to meet with Kadushin for
the purposes of exchanging information and resolving
misunderstandings, without violating the Open Meetings Act. Surely
this ought to be done.
I
request that you please appoint a committee to meet with the
developer, Kadushin Associates, to resolve several misunderstandings
that were created by the resolution the DDA passed on June
7th.
Thank
You.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment