Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Comments and request made at City Council on September 14
September 14, 2010
Ladies and Gentlemen:
My name is Jan Bernath, and I live at 238 Harrison Street. The last time I was before this body was less than a year ago when I presented 700 signatures of area residents who did not want the Longworth Property demolished. Since that time, a group of hard-working, knowledgeable, skilled Chelsea citizens submitted a proposal to buy the property in response to the DDA's RFP. It was declined on August 19.
You all have received an email from Cathy Bean today citing, in detail, the reasons the impending demolition of the Daniels Addition and the livery is an unwise decision. The categories of those reason are:
1.financial/fiscal responsibility
2.historic significance
3.environmental
4.public accountability
5.partnering for a maximum solution
6.improper operation of the DDA
It's my understanding that the Council has oversight of the DDA by approval of the:
1.overall budget
2.mayor's appointment of a nominee to fill a vacancy
3.bonds for long term debt
4.changes in the DDA charter
I respectfully urge a motion tonight to direct the city manager and staff to temporarily halt further work on the due care plan and application for a demolition permit. This would allow you to read, study and discuss the information provided to you by Cathy Bean.
You are the stewards of our community resources. As elected officials, you operate within the five ethical principles of the government of the City of Chelsea. Thank you for your service.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
My name is Jan Bernath, and I live at 238 Harrison Street. The last time I was before this body was less than a year ago when I presented 700 signatures of area residents who did not want the Longworth Property demolished. Since that time, a group of hard-working, knowledgeable, skilled Chelsea citizens submitted a proposal to buy the property in response to the DDA's RFP. It was declined on August 19.
You all have received an email from Cathy Bean today citing, in detail, the reasons the impending demolition of the Daniels Addition and the livery is an unwise decision. The categories of those reason are:
1.financial/fiscal responsibility
2.historic significance
3.environmental
4.public accountability
5.partnering for a maximum solution
6.improper operation of the DDA
It's my understanding that the Council has oversight of the DDA by approval of the:
1.overall budget
2.mayor's appointment of a nominee to fill a vacancy
3.bonds for long term debt
4.changes in the DDA charter
I respectfully urge a motion tonight to direct the city manager and staff to temporarily halt further work on the due care plan and application for a demolition permit. This would allow you to read, study and discuss the information provided to you by Cathy Bean.
You are the stewards of our community resources. As elected officials, you operate within the five ethical principles of the government of the City of Chelsea. Thank you for your service.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment