Points
from DDA work session 5.10.12
discussion
of two proposals submitted for
redevelopment/reuse
of Longworth Properties
Discussion
largely related to Goals of RFP and Redevelopment goals below:
GOALS
OF THE RFP INCLUDE: Select an interested private party to
1)
Purchase the property and return it to the tax rolls
2)
Offer to purchase must be accompanied by a firm commitment from a
financial
institution
or equivalent source for a minimum of $1 Million for investment in
the
property
and improvements
3)
A time line for the project and a business plan acceptable to the DDA
The
project should contain, but will not be limited to, a combination of
such uses as
Mixed
Use Development
(1)
Retail;
(2)
Housing;
(3)
Restaurant;
(4)
Parking.
Redevelopment
Goals:
In
addition to the general list of uses for the development of
the
"Former Longworth Plating building," a series of goals for
the redevelopment of
the
property were established through a planning process. Those goals
include:
Continuation
Revitalization of the Downtown.
The
development of the Longworth Plating site shall serve as a continuing
development effort and redevelopment of the entire Downtown.
Linkages
and Connections.
The
site should be designed so that the development forms physical and
visual linkages and connections with the Downtown and the McKinley
Clocktower Complex.
Design
Quality.
The
development should be designed with "landmark" visual
qualities befitting the strategic location of the site. The
architecture should follow local historic examples and redevelopment
guidelines.
Fiscal
Benefit to the City.
The
development of the site should be fiscally beneficial to the City of
Chelsea by enhancing economic growth in the City, increasing the tax
base, attracting new businesses and promoting job growth.
Proposals
submitted: (Please see previous postings on blospot for proposals)
#1.
Proposal submitted by Prochaska and Zachary projects an investment
of 3.8 M.
#2.
Proposal submitted by the Longworth Building Development Co (Alex
Pollock, JC Beal, Kadushin Assoc., Dangerous Artchitect) projects
investment of 2.1 M
Comments:
All
DDA BOD present were pleased that two proposals were submitted.
Both
proposals exceed the required 1 M investment.
Concerns:
Is
a pottery studio economically viable?
Would
another restaurant in town be able to compete?
What
about parking?
Time
line on proposal #2 is a concern.
What
role does the DDA play?
Who
owns parking near Depot? City? Depot Association?
Who
bears the cost of the street scape?
General
comments:
Tax
abatement is a Council concern, but not favored by DDA.
Accommodation
for Farmer's Supply is an advantage for owners.
DDA
has the ability to wave some requirements of RFP.
#2.
proposal addresses mixed-use more thoroughly.
Future
of Chelsea is mixed-use.
#
2 will serve as a tourist attraction.
Jiffy Mix brings in 25,000 visitors a year.
We
need downtown housing.
Like
downtown housing of #1 but concerned about that it is spec housing.
There
most likely is a liquor license available for that site.
#
2 proposal removes Daniels showroom.
Don't
worry about what goes into mixed-use.
Consider
the Baltimore plan: if developers don't have the building ready for
inspection by X date, building reverts to city in better condition.
Then write new RFP.
Allow
pedestrian movement to building from West Middle Street.
Selected
proposal will need to go to Planning Commission.
Wait
until building and street scape are done before considering
additional lighting.
Want
control over lighting.
Next
steps:
Regular DDA meeting next Thursday, May
17th.
Invite
both developers for presentation on submitted proposal (not changed)
and question and answer period. Invitation will be for Thursday,
May 31st,
at 7:30 a.m. in McKune Room. Public invited to observe only.
No comments:
Post a Comment